The writer divides Athenian society into the "good" (i.e. aristocracy) and the "bad" (i.e. the common man), stating that Athens' democracy does not rest on sound principles; it makes no sense to give decision making power to the "bad" men in society.
But he notes that the system does a commendable job of maintaining a stable democracy, if that was the goal of its constituents.
Good or bad, it's very interesting to hear a contemporary discuss his perspective on such an important subject, adding rich detail to the realities of the time.
I need to find more such short, pointed, contemporary writings.
No comments:
Post a Comment